| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 5 |
> On 12:15 Thu 23 Apr , Tiziano Müller wrote: |
| 6 |
>> Am Mittwoch, den 22.04.2009, 23:21 -0700 schrieb Donnie Berkholz: |
| 7 |
>>> Here is an updated agenda. I've removed a few items that I consider |
| 8 |
>>> lower priority and unlikely for us to have time for during this |
| 9 |
>>> week's meeting. Also, I added the issue about USE=static-libs |
| 10 |
>>> because I think it's important. |
| 11 |
>> I'd really like to see the topic about "portage changing behaviour" |
| 12 |
>> being discussed since I see it as crucial for future eapi/portage/pm |
| 13 |
>> development and I therefore consider it urgent as well. Furthermore it |
| 14 |
>> has been deferred already once. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Which other important topic should we drop for it? I'm thinking we |
| 17 |
> probably won't even get to the last one, that's almost a wish list. I |
| 18 |
> think there's a pretty reasonable chance we also wouldn't get to |
| 19 |
> whatever other items came after this one. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Zac, have you commented on this topic previously? How do you think it |
| 22 |
> should work? See "Portage changing behavior in ebuild-visible ways" at |
| 23 |
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~dberkholz/20090514-agenda.txt for a description. |
| 24 |
> CC'ing you to make sure you see this... |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
In the cases mentioned, I think that more communication would have |
| 27 |
helped, and I wasn't as careful as I should have been. In |
| 28 |
the future, I want to strive to use more communication to avoid |
| 29 |
problems like these. |
| 30 |
- -- |
| 31 |
Thanks, |
| 32 |
Zac |
| 33 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 34 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
iEYEARECAAYFAknwp8EACgkQ/ejvha5XGaME8QCg3O1fMWlN87aH8xyfqy6mZK8+ |
| 37 |
KxkAoMP7SJKdhZSJ7H8nq47HnmKUXjOF |
| 38 |
=4e2L |
| 39 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives