1 |
On 07/03/2020 19.27, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
2 |
>>>>>> On Sat, 07 Mar 2020, Michał Górny wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>>> Just the ebuild being outdated doesn't sound like a sufficient reason |
5 |
>>> for removal of a package, at least not for those packages that install |
6 |
>>> applications for the end user. |
7 |
> |
8 |
>> The list is almost exclusively about dev-python/, i.e. packages that |
9 |
>> do not install end-user applications but Python modules. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Like www-apps/nikola, for example? |
12 |
> |
13 |
|
14 |
Nikola is actively maintained and was recently updated. |
15 |
It works fine and has many users. |
16 |
|
17 |
Did you look into that package before hard masking? |
18 |
I see no problems with this package. |
19 |
https://github.com/getnikola/nikola/blob/master/setup.py |
20 |
|
21 |
Please undo the masking of fully working packages. |
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
Best, |
25 |
Jonas |