1 |
On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 12:17 PM Jonas Stein <jstein@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> On 07/03/2020 19.27, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
4 |
> >>>>>> On Sat, 07 Mar 2020, Michał Górny wrote: |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> >>> Just the ebuild being outdated doesn't sound like a sufficient reason |
7 |
> >>> for removal of a package, at least not for those packages that install |
8 |
> >>> applications for the end user. |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> >> The list is almost exclusively about dev-python/, i.e. packages that |
11 |
> >> do not install end-user applications but Python modules. |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > Like www-apps/nikola, for example? |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Nikola is actively maintained and was recently updated. |
17 |
> It works fine and has many users. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Did you look into that package before hard masking? |
20 |
> I see no problems with this package. |
21 |
> https://github.com/getnikola/nikola/blob/master/setup.py |
22 |
> |
23 |
> Please undo the masking of fully working packages. |
24 |
|
25 |
Christ guys. Just add python 3.7 support and unmask it. |