| 1 |
On Sat, 2020-03-07 at 12:26 -0800, Matt Turner wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 12:17 PM Jonas Stein <jstein@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On 07/03/2020 19.27, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > > > > > > On Sat, 07 Mar 2020, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > > > Just the ebuild being outdated doesn't sound like a sufficient reason |
| 6 |
> > > > > for removal of a package, at least not for those packages that install |
| 7 |
> > > > > applications for the end user. |
| 8 |
> > > > The list is almost exclusively about dev-python/, i.e. packages that |
| 9 |
> > > > do not install end-user applications but Python modules. |
| 10 |
> > > |
| 11 |
> > > Like www-apps/nikola, for example? |
| 12 |
> > > |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > Nikola is actively maintained and was recently updated. |
| 15 |
> > It works fine and has many users. |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> > Did you look into that package before hard masking? |
| 18 |
> > I see no problems with this package. |
| 19 |
> > https://github.com/getnikola/nikola/blob/master/setup.py |
| 20 |
> > |
| 21 |
> > Please undo the masking of fully working packages. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Christ guys. Just add python 3.7 support and unmask it. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
...and 3.8, please, so we don't have to go back here a year from now. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Best regards, |
| 29 |
Michał Górny |
Archives