1 |
Couldn't we just use different ebuild versions? |
2 |
|
3 |
# emerge ">=gentoo-sources-2.6" |
4 |
# emerge "=gentoo-sources-2.4.27" |
5 |
|
6 |
Or something similar? Would that work? |
7 |
|
8 |
Travis Tilley wrote: |
9 |
> if we must keep the 2.6 kernels seperate, i suggest that we at least |
10 |
> change the name of the package. it's incredibly confusing to have your |
11 |
> stable kernel named 'development-sources' or 'gentoo-dev-sources', and |
12 |
> there are archs like amd64 that just dont support 2.4 in any way. plus |
13 |
> with the new change in kernel development, mm-sources has become the |
14 |
> official development tree. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> does anyone object to renaming development-sources to linux26-sources? |
17 |
> perhaps a similar name change for gentoo-dev-sources and |
18 |
> hardened-dev-sources? |
19 |
> |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Travis Tilley <lv@g.o> |
22 |
> |
23 |
> -- |
24 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
25 |
> |
26 |
|
27 |
-- |
28 |
() The ASCII Ribbon Campaign - against HTML Email, |
29 |
/\ vCards, and proprietary formats. |
30 |
--------------------------------------------------- |
31 |
Peter A. Gordon |
32 |
E-Mail: admin@×××××××××××××××××.com |
33 |
GPG Public Key ID: 0x109DBECE |
34 |
GPG Key Fingerprint (SHA1): |
35 |
E485 E2F7 11CE F9B2 E3D9 C95D 208F B732 109D BECE |
36 |
--------------------------------------------------- |
37 |
I digitally sign (using GnuPG) every email I write. |
38 |
If this or any other email that you recieve from me |
39 |
is not signed, or has a bad OpenPGP signature, |
40 |
please notify me. Thank you. --Peter |
41 |
--------------------------------------------------- |