| 1 |
if we must keep the 2.6 kernels seperate, i suggest that we at least |
| 2 |
change the name of the package. it's incredibly confusing to have your |
| 3 |
stable kernel named 'development-sources' or 'gentoo-dev-sources', and |
| 4 |
there are archs like amd64 that just dont support 2.4 in any way. plus |
| 5 |
with the new change in kernel development, mm-sources has become the |
| 6 |
official development tree. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
does anyone object to renaming development-sources to linux26-sources? |
| 9 |
perhaps a similar name change for gentoo-dev-sources and |
| 10 |
hardened-dev-sources? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Travis Tilley <lv@g.o> |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives