| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 22:06:40 +0100 |
| 4 |
> Steve Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 5 |
>> > Have a look at, for example, [1], where Mike already gave you an |
| 6 |
>> > answer one of the previous times we discussed it. |
| 7 |
>> > |
| 8 |
>> I'm aware of the prior discussion. |
| 9 |
>> Re-read it, and tell me what it breaks, if you can. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Well, which part of the previous times it's been explained to you didn't |
| 12 |
> you understand? |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
No one has ever given me a technical reason. I thought you might have light |
| 15 |
to shed; clearly not. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Please don't reply to my posts if you don't have any actual information to |
| 18 |
add; I realise you like long fruitless mail 'discussions', and apparently |
| 19 |
have lots of time for them, but I don't, and I don't enjoy reading them |
| 20 |
either. This kind of one-liner with zero content, and no intent but to |
| 21 |
insult, should simply be binned without sending imo. |
Archives