Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Benjamin Podszun <ben@××××××××××××××.de>
To: "Robin H.Johnson" <robbat2@g.o>
Cc: Brian Jackson <brian@××××.com>, gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Performance once again..
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 21:47:54
Message-Id: 1050184000.1273.32.camel@blafasel
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Performance once again.. by "Robin H.Johnson"
1 On Sat, 2003-04-12 at 22:45, Robin H.Johnson wrote:
2 > On Sat, Apr 12, 2003 at 10:32:00PM +0200, Benjamin Podszun wrote:
3 > > The Apache-Version is the same, so is the configuration.
4 > > The only thing that I noticed is that one apache instance sucks up to
5 > > 99% CPU... It never uses less than 30% ..
6 > > And since this is a Compaq Server with Dual P3 1GHz and 2GB RAM I doubt
7 > > that this is right (tm).
8 > Do you use PHP (and possibly MySQL) on that machine? I saw that problem
9 > on my Slackware box a few months ago. I never did find the solution tho,
10 > as I upgraded to Apache2. I did confirm that the bug didn't occur when
11 > PHP wasn't being used for me. For some reason, PHP seemed to be in a
12 > massive loop after the page was sent, eating CPU and memory.
13
14 Uhm.. Yes, I use Apache and PHP. MySQL as well, but not on that host (3
15 production servers, two of them only with apache/php, both compaq as
16 stated above, the third only serves as DB-Server. Both Webserver have
17 that problem.
18
19 You upgraded to Apache2? I guess (hope?) that you don't talk about
20 production environments? I tried to use Apache2 with PHP twice and
21 wouldn't recommend it to anyone.. It's just buggy and not usable. As my
22 current Gentoo-Servers are.. *cough*
23
24 > A good temporary workaround is to have a little watcher shell script
25 > that looks for any apache processes that have been eating >80% CPU for
26 > the all of the last 30 seconds (I checked at 30 second intervals) and
27 > send a SIGKILL to them.
28
29 Well, that's an ugly hack.. Yes, thanks for the hint, but I already
30 thought about something like this.. And I don't think that it solves a
31 single problem, nor is it a suitable solution on a (I love this word)
32 production environment.

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Performance once again.. leahcim@××××××××.com
Re: [gentoo-dev] Performance once again.. "Robin H.Johnson" <robbat2@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Performance once again.. Brad Laue <brad@××××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Performance once again.. Terje Kvernes <terjekv@××××××××.no>