1 |
On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 3:08:30 PM EST Michael Mol wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> > IMHO it is something that should be a part of LSB. If not POSIX in |
4 |
> > general. One cannot really change the past or current state of things. |
5 |
> > But can make |
6 |
> the future better. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> > For now who cares about other OS or distros. If Gentoo gets its house in |
9 |
> > order |
10 |
> > others may follow. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> I will note that it's this point when I first replied; that was the point |
13 |
> when you chose to expand the scope outside Gentoo. |
14 |
|
15 |
Stop making things into something they are not. Re-read the above I said it |
16 |
should be part of official standards. I also said others MAY follow... |
17 |
|
18 |
> > Gentoo cannot force others to do anything. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> I didn't say force. I said invite. |
21 |
|
22 |
I never typed the word invite. I never mentioned Gentoo being proactive about |
23 |
pushing its specific things on others. Please stop making stuff up and going |
24 |
way off topic. |
25 |
|
26 |
|
27 |
> As you noted, Arch appeared to attempt this, and others did not follow. |
28 |
|
29 |
Arch themselves never got it squared away. It was just a concept. If Arch does |
30 |
not implement it how can others? I hardly consider Arch a leading distro like |
31 |
RHEL or Debian, which both have derivatives in wide use, Fedora, CentOS and |
32 |
Ubuntu. |
33 |
|
34 |
That right there likely covers over 50% of all Linux installs. |
35 |
|
36 |
|
37 |
> That's fine. As I pointed out, I only started chiming in when you began |
38 |
> advocating exporting Gentoo's list to a broader ecosystem. |
39 |
|
40 |
You are reading things I never typed, and coming up with some far fetched |
41 |
scenarios. Nothing you are saying is anywhere near what I wrote. |
42 |
|
43 |
> If RHEL and Debian are consistent from one system to the next, obviously |
44 |
> it's sensical to use their list. But why don't they use each others? Or am |
45 |
> I missing something, and that's exactly what they're doing? |
46 |
|
47 |
Going back to my first point about this being part of LSB or POSIX. Because it |
48 |
is part of neither RedHat and Debian do things differently. |
49 |
|
50 |
Why does RedHat not use deb format over rpm. Why does Debian use deb instead |
51 |
of RPM. These are different distros with different approaches. If their UID/ |
52 |
GID are the same, its likely per legacy reasons. Though they may be looking at |
53 |
each other. |
54 |
|
55 |
Debian at this time does not produce a list. The only I found were RedHat and |
56 |
Arch, with Archs' being unofficial and never adopted. |
57 |
|
58 |
> Sure. But if you clone a seed node, does it matter that a second |
59 |
> from-scratch install may not have the same mapping? |
60 |
|
61 |
Yes if they are to be added to the same fleet or cluster of systems. In that |
62 |
event it would likely start a new from scratch base image. But that is pretty |
63 |
rare. I do update base images, though rarely do system UID/GID change from |
64 |
initial install. |
65 |
|
66 |
> If UID/GID are consistent between RH and Debian, then yeah, what you have is |
67 |
> a de facto standard, and it would be reasonable to conform, if there are |
68 |
> people who actually have a need for that cross-system mirroring. |
69 |
|
70 |
If Gentoo does the same, that would make one other and moving all more in the |
71 |
direction of a standard. |
72 |
|
73 |
> > > More daemons will be build that are intended to |
74 |
> > > run as local users. More software will be pushed into opaque blobs a la |
75 |
> > > Snap and Flatpack. |
76 |
> > |
77 |
> > I am talking about core system accounts |
78 |
> |
79 |
> Who decides what qualifies as a core system account? |
80 |
|
81 |
This is pretty silly now and way off topic. I will leave it to others to |
82 |
decide. I would prefer to go beyond just system so it is Gentoo wide. Arch was |
83 |
not limited to system stuff, like RedHat and Debian. |
84 |
|
85 |
Really up to Gentoo Developers to decide it all. |
86 |
|
87 |
-- |
88 |
William L. Thomson Jr. |