Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o>
To: Gentoo Development <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Cc: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] metadata.xsd: upstream maintainer must have exactly one <name/> element
Date: Fri, 06 May 2016 07:39:58
Message-Id: CAKmKYaCkkM2Guf+_Q6PkFjRYzM-dL+Jd+_TAm9GDON3+gvfLhw@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] metadata.xsd: upstream maintainer must have exactly one element by "Göktürk Yüksek"
1 On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 1:16 AM, Göktürk Yüksek <gokturk@××××××××××.edu> wrote:
2 > Signed-off-by: Göktürk Yüksek <gokturk@××××××××××.edu>
3 > ---
4 > metadata.xsd | 2 +-
5 > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
6 >
7 > diff --git a/metadata.xsd b/metadata.xsd
8 > index 8bc6a4e..fe2c5d2 100644
9 > --- a/metadata.xsd
10 > +++ b/metadata.xsd
11 > @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@
12 > <xs:element name='email' type='emailType'
13 > minOccurs='0'/>
14 > <xs:element name='name' type='xs:token'
15 > - minOccurs='0'/>
16 > + minOccurs='1'/>
17 > </xs:all>
18 > <xs:attribute name='status' type='upstreamMaintainerStatusAttrType'
19 > default='unknown'/>
20
21 IMO this patch could do with a bit more rationale. Personally, I don't
22 like this change, as it seems enough in many cases to just add an
23 email address for an upstream maintainer (for example, maybe the
24 upstream maintainer is a mailing list?).
25
26 Cheers,
27
28 Dirkjan

Replies