| 1 |
Dirkjan Ochtman: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 1:16 AM, Göktürk Yüksek <gokturk@××××××××××.edu> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Signed-off-by: Göktürk Yüksek <gokturk@××××××××××.edu> |
| 4 |
>> --- |
| 5 |
>> metadata.xsd | 2 +- |
| 6 |
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> diff --git a/metadata.xsd b/metadata.xsd |
| 9 |
>> index 8bc6a4e..fe2c5d2 100644 |
| 10 |
>> --- a/metadata.xsd |
| 11 |
>> +++ b/metadata.xsd |
| 12 |
>> @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ |
| 13 |
>> <xs:element name='email' type='emailType' |
| 14 |
>> minOccurs='0'/> |
| 15 |
>> <xs:element name='name' type='xs:token' |
| 16 |
>> - minOccurs='0'/> |
| 17 |
>> + minOccurs='1'/> |
| 18 |
>> </xs:all> |
| 19 |
>> <xs:attribute name='status' type='upstreamMaintainerStatusAttrType' |
| 20 |
>> default='unknown'/> |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> IMO this patch could do with a bit more rationale. Personally, I don't |
| 23 |
> like this change, as it seems enough in many cases to just add an |
| 24 |
> email address for an upstream maintainer (for example, maybe the |
| 25 |
> upstream maintainer is a mailing list?). |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
The change only reflects what's already in GLEP 68 [0] which itself |
| 29 |
derives this condition from GLEP 46 [1] which has the following clause: |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
""" |
| 32 |
name should contain a block of text with upstream's name, is mandatory |
| 33 |
and can only appear once. |
| 34 |
""" |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
It has been this way since ~2008 according to the GLEP bug [2]. |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
> Cheers, |
| 39 |
> |
| 40 |
> Dirkjan |
| 41 |
> |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
[0] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/GLEP:68#Upstream_maintainer_descriptions |
| 44 |
[1] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/GLEP:46 |
| 45 |
[2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=234730 |
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
-- |
| 48 |
gokturk |
Archives