1 |
On Wednesday 07 April 2010 21:41:49 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 10:24 PM, Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> |
3 |
wrote: |
4 |
> > On Tuesday 06 April 2010 05:13:02 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: |
5 |
> > Just a question: |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > Why do we even need to care about ChangeLog files? Can't we just use the |
8 |
> > git commit message to generate logs? E.g run a script on server side |
9 |
> > which will read the whole git shortlog and generate a changelog every |
10 |
> > $timeframe? |
11 |
> |
12 |
> You seem to have missed the gist of the situation. I'm quoting it here |
13 |
> again to highlight it: |
14 |
> |
15 |
> * It makes zero sense to manually manage ChangeLogs in git[1] |
16 |
> [snip] |
17 |
> * Proposed is to generate ChangeLogs from git commits on the rsync |
18 |
> server side when metadata generation is done |
19 |
> - Scripts to do this already exist[1] |
20 |
> [snip] |
21 |
> |
22 |
> 1. http://live.gnome.org/Git/ChangeLog |
23 |
Ah you are right. It seems that I missed that e-mail on my inbox. Thanks for |
24 |
posting it again. |
25 |
It seems we are on the same page :) |
26 |
-- |
27 |
Markos Chandras (hwoarang) |
28 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |
29 |
Web: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.org |