Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jack Morgan <yojack@××××××××××××.jp>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] default-1.0-gcc3 success
Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 01:04:20
Message-Id: 20020529145520.GA22383@c3p0.bonyari.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] default-1.0-gcc3 success by "Webmaster Refstart.NL"
1 On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 07:43:47AM +0200, Webmaster Refstart. NL wrote:
2 > This is very cool, are you using binutils 2.12 (combreloc tweak) or the default 2.11?
3 > I'm trying to bootstrap my system with GCC 3.1 and binutils 2.12, but I get this error while compiling glibc:
4 >
5 > gawk: scripts/versions.awk:68: (FILENAME=- FNR=3) fatal: printf to "sort -n > /v
6 > ar/tmp/portage/glibc-2.2.5-r2/work/glibc-2.2.5/buildhere/Versions.tmp" failed (B
7 > roken pipe)
8 > sed: couldn't write 69 items to {standard output}: Broken pipe
9 > stdout: Broken pipe
10 > make[1]: *** [/var/tmp/portage/glibc-2.2.5-r2/work/glibc-2.2.5/buildhere/sysd-ve
11 > rsions] Error 2
12 > make[1]: Leaving directory '/var/tmp/portage/glibc-2.2.5-r2/work/glibc-2.2.5'
13 > make: *** [all] Error 2
14 >
15 > !!! ERROR: The ebuild did not complete succesfully.
16 > !!! Function src_compile, Line 14, Exitcode 2
17 > !!! (no error message)
18 >
19 > !!! emerge aborting on /usr/portage/sys-libs/glibc/glibc-2.2.5-r2.ebuild .
20 >
21 > How can I solve this? Should I bootstrap my system with GCC 2.95 and then install GCC 3.1?
22
23 I had the exact same error when I tried to upgrade and failed. What I wish I had
24 done was:
25
26 *backup any files you want to keep before trying this*
27
28 1) ln -s /usr/portage/profiles/default-1.0-gcc3 /etc/make.profile
29 2) emerge -e world
30 3) Change -march/-mcpu
31
32 If this doesn't work, try reinstalling?
33
34 --
35 jack_morgan

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] default-1.0-gcc3 success Lost Logic <lostlogic@××××××××××.com>