Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Webmaster Refstart.NL" <webmaster@××××××××.nl>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Cc: yojack@××××××××××××.jp
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] default-1.0-gcc3 success
Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 00:45:52
Message-Id: 20020529074347.562ca7d1.webmaster@refstart.nl
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] default-1.0-gcc3 success by Jack Morgan
1 This is very cool, are you using binutils 2.12 (combreloc tweak) or the default 2.11?
2 I'm trying to bootstrap my system with GCC 3.1 and binutils 2.12, but I get this error while compiling glibc:
3
4 gawk: scripts/versions.awk:68: (FILENAME=- FNR=3) fatal: printf to "sort -n > /v
5 ar/tmp/portage/glibc-2.2.5-r2/work/glibc-2.2.5/buildhere/Versions.tmp" failed (B
6 roken pipe)
7 sed: couldn't write 69 items to {standard output}: Broken pipe
8 stdout: Broken pipe
9 make[1]: *** [/var/tmp/portage/glibc-2.2.5-r2/work/glibc-2.2.5/buildhere/sysd-ve
10 rsions] Error 2
11 make[1]: Leaving directory '/var/tmp/portage/glibc-2.2.5-r2/work/glibc-2.2.5'
12 make: *** [all] Error 2
13
14 !!! ERROR: The ebuild did not complete succesfully.
15 !!! Function src_compile, Line 14, Exitcode 2
16 !!! (no error message)
17
18 !!! emerge aborting on /usr/portage/sys-libs/glibc/glibc-2.2.5-r2.ebuild .
19
20 How can I solve this? Should I bootstrap my system with GCC 2.95 and then install GCC 3.1?
21
22 Bye, Niek.
23
24
25 On Wed, 29 May 2002 14:24:18 +0000
26 Jack Morgan <yojack@××××××××××××.jp> wrote:
27
28 > I did a fresh install after borking an upgrade atempt. I was able to
29 > get gcc3.1 to bootstrap. I installed from cdrom, BTW. Here is a short
30 > summary:
31 >
32 > 1) Bootstrap phase
33 > Perl wouldn't compile. I had to unmask it, eg comment it out, in
34 > package.mask. Then it compiled. Version perl5.6.1-r4, I think.
35 > My USE variables were set to the default or USE="" and my compiler
36 > was set to -march=i686 -O6
37 >
38 > 2) Emerge system
39 > Everything compiled fine here. Once the system was installed, I added
40 > many USE variables and changed my compiler to -march=athlon -O6. All
41 > packages installed after this worked fine using athlon optimization.
42 > At this point, I wanted to do, emrege -e world but was afraid ;-)
43 >
44 > 3) Xfree-4.2.0-r9
45 > Wouldn't compile. I unmasked this in package.mask and I'm currently
46 > compiling xfree-4.2.0-r11. I'll let you know how it goes.
47 >
48 > Anyway, thanks to all devlopers working on getting gcc-3.1 working.
49 >
50 > --
51 > jack_morgan
52 >
53 > _______________________________________________
54 > gentoo-dev mailing list
55 > gentoo-dev@g.o
56 > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] default-1.0-gcc3 success Jack Morgan <yojack@××××××××××××.jp>
Re: [gentoo-dev] default-1.0-gcc3 success Lars Pechan <lars.pechan@××××××××××××.nz>