| 1 |
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 23:21 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Goals: Any unanswered queries? Figure out what to do with features |
| 5 |
> receiving a "no." |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
I think the whole council should understand why something received a |
| 8 |
"no" from someone, as they might be important technical (or subjective) |
| 9 |
arguments against having that in EAPI-3, as to be able to make an |
| 10 |
informed decision that is best for the whole of Gentoo. |
| 11 |
I believe we have up to now just given individual stances on the |
| 12 |
features - voting based on that doesn't really work right. It is quite |
| 13 |
likely that almost all features will get a majority "yes" vote when |
| 14 |
taken individually because not all council members have seen the |
| 15 |
problems a few of the council members have. |
| 16 |
So my point is that the whole of the council should consider the |
| 17 |
objections of an individual council member, so that potentially bad |
| 18 |
things don't end up accepted based on some kind of an uninformed |
| 19 |
majority vote or concensus. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Mart Raudsepp |
| 24 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 25 |
Mail: leio@g.o |
| 26 |
Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio |
Archives