| 1 |
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 14:54:10 +0100 |
| 2 |
"Denis Dupeyron" <calchan@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> On Dec 20, 2007 12:12 PM, Ciaran McCreesh |
| 4 |
> <ciaran.mccreesh@×××××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > I'm guessing there're lots of people moaning because they think they |
| 6 |
> > understand filenames and can therefore comment. Unfortunately, most |
| 7 |
> > of those people don't understand the metadata generation process, |
| 8 |
> > and therefore can't comment usefully... |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Stop guessing, then. You're way off. You apparently do not understand |
| 11 |
> that an assertion without justification has no value in a serious |
| 12 |
> discussion. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
I was being nice. Next time I'll post a list of names of people who |
| 15 |
don't understand the metadata generation process and who therefore |
| 16 |
can't comment usefully... |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> Even it that has already been explained somewhere else, it |
| 19 |
> may have been interpreted differently by different people (assuming |
| 20 |
> they can find it). |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
How they interpret is different from the objective fact of what the |
| 23 |
process is. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
> And sorry to disappoint you but you're not alway |
| 26 |
> right. You have to give people a chance to contradict you, for your |
| 27 |
> own good. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
People who know what they're talking about are more than welcome to |
| 30 |
contradict me. People who don't understand what's being discussed |
| 31 |
(which is most people in this thread) need to learn to stop wasting |
| 32 |
people's time. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives