Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI 3 PMS Draft
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 19:09:23
Message-Id: 20090411131037.46bb56ac@halo.dirtyepic.sk.ca
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 3 PMS Draft by Mart Raudsepp
1 On Thu, 09 Apr 2009 19:20:39 +0300
2 Mart Raudsepp <leio@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > All developers should enable it (a QA enforcement), but users by default
5 > - no, NO.
6 > There is more to a distribution than technical considerations.
7
8 Yes, please, and can we do it now? I am frankly sick of failing testsuites
9 and would really like everyone else to be sick of them too.
10
11
12 --
13 gcc-porting, by design, by neglect
14 treecleaner, for a fact or just for effect
15 wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature