| 1 |
Dnia 2014-08-30, o godz. 13:27:08 |
| 2 |
"J. Roeleveld" <joost@××××××××.org> napisał(a): |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Friday, August 29, 2014 10:41:51 PM Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 5 |
> > On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Jauhien Piatlicki <jauhien@g.o> |
| 6 |
> wrote: |
| 7 |
> > > Hi all, |
| 8 |
> > > |
| 9 |
> > > I have a simple question: why do we have systemd subprofiles only in gnome |
| 10 |
> > > and kde profiles? |
| 11 |
> > > |
| 12 |
> > > Could we add systemd subprofiles also to default/linux/$arch/13.0/ and |
| 13 |
> > > desktop (and any other profiles where it makes sense)? |
| 14 |
> > I'm not sure systemd profiles actually make that much sense these |
| 15 |
> > days. To install systemd from a stage3 you basically just need to set |
| 16 |
> > USE=systemd and do an emerge -uDN world. We're actually getting close |
| 17 |
> > to the point where you would pick an init system the way you pick a |
| 18 |
> > kernel or cron implementation during install. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Not sure if this idea has been discussed before, but: |
| 21 |
> Wouldn't it be an idea to have a "virtual/init" which depends on 1 of: |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
You mean our virtual/service-manager? |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Best regards, |
| 27 |
Michał Górny |
Archives