| 1 |
Duncan wrote: |
| 2 |
> Steve Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk> posted |
| 3 |
> fkiasm$3be$1@×××××××××.org, excerpted below, on Sat, 22 Dec 2007 06:35:07 |
| 4 |
> +0000: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
>> Oh yeah I forgot, McCreesh thinks they're all idiots[1], so let's just |
| 7 |
>> do what he says. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
>> [1] |
| 10 |
>> http://lab.obsethryl.eu/content/paludis-gentoo-and-ciaran-mccreesh- |
| 11 |
> uncensored |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> I read the same interview and didn't take it like that, but regardless, |
| 14 |
> why are you dropping this discussion to a new low? Until you came along, |
| 15 |
> altho there was disagreement, people were at least maintaining some |
| 16 |
> civility in the discussion. Then you come along, and I see multiple |
| 17 |
> personal attack posts. That's not right, and until now, we'd avoided it. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Please apologize. Just because you don't agree with someone doesn't mean |
| 20 |
> you have to take it to the level you just have, and it does NOT help. (I |
| 21 |
> thank you for your agreement with me, as it happens, disagreeing with |
| 22 |
> Ciaran, on the users thing, but again, we had kept it civil. Here, you |
| 23 |
> aren't, and it doesn't belong on the list, and regardless of whether you |
| 24 |
> just agreed with me or not, you need called on it, and I don't see any |
| 25 |
> other posts doing it yet, so...) |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
I don't accept that I took it to that level, but I apologise unreservedly |
| 28 |
for responding to it. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives