| 1 |
Hi all! |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Why not use redmine as sources.gentoo.org? |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
2011/1/22 Theo Chatzimichos <tampakrap@g.o>: |
| 6 |
> On Saturday 22 January 2011 06:20:27 Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 7 |
>> I don't see any particular reason to distinguish between the main tree |
| 8 |
>> and overlays in this structure. Just do something common for both, like |
| 9 |
>> tree/ or ebuilds/ or packages/. In the same vein, there's no good reason |
| 10 |
>> I can think of to discriminate between overlays that are project vs |
| 11 |
>> personal, since either can be supported or unsupported. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> And I don't see a reason to merge the huge overlays list with the official |
| 14 |
> gentoo tree. They are totally different things, and a future alternative to |
| 15 |
> viewvc in sources.gentoo.org (maybe trac-git) should reflect that. If we show |
| 16 |
> a huge list with ebuild repos to public (especially to new to gentoo) without |
| 17 |
> separating the official tree (including user/unofficial/bad-shaped ones), I |
| 18 |
> suppose we'll give the impression we are like debian, where the user needs the |
| 19 |
> multimedia overlay to get multimedia ebuilds, or the kde overlay to install |
| 20 |
> kde. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> For the second part of your question, Ryan's responce is perfect. |
| 23 |
> -- |
| 24 |
> Theo Chatzimichos (tampakrap) |
| 25 |
> Gentoo KDE/Qt, Planet, Overlays |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Best Regards, |
| 32 |
Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov |
| 33 |
Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, Russia |
| 34 |
Department of Molecular and Radiation Biophysics |
| 35 |
Gentoo Team Ru |
| 36 |
Gentoo Linux Dev |
| 37 |
mailto:alexxyum@×××××.com |
| 38 |
mailto:alexxy@g.o |
| 39 |
mailto:alexxy@×××××××××××××.ru |
Archives