1 |
On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 01:33:24 -0800 |
2 |
Daniel Campbell <zlg@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On 11/26/2016 01:08 AM, Michał Górny wrote: |
5 |
> > On Sat, 26 Nov 2016 00:03:59 -0800 |
6 |
> > Daniel Campbell <zlg@g.o> wrote: |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> >> <rant> |
9 |
> >> A funny deficiency of GitHub is it doesn't allow for open conversations. |
10 |
> >> You're always forced to talk about something directly related to the |
11 |
> >> code, like an Issue or a Commit. Gists can be somewhat analogous to an |
12 |
> >> open discussion, but that strikes me as abuse of the medium. |
13 |
> >> Additionally, it's not a threaded format so it's hard to guess which |
14 |
> >> branch of conversation you're on. |
15 |
> >> |
16 |
> >> Of course sometimes you *want* to focus strictly on the code, but that's |
17 |
> >> not how real-world organizations work. They're made of people, and most |
18 |
> >> people end up talking about things *around* the code that are still |
19 |
> >> important, like the various RFCs that we post here on the ML. None of |
20 |
> >> what GitHub offers is suitable for that imo. |
21 |
> >> </rant> |
22 |
> > |
23 |
> > GitHub is a code hosting and review tool, not a forum. It's not |
24 |
> > a replacement for everything ever invented. |
25 |
> > |
26 |
> The GitHub guys seem to disagree with you; unless you consider custom |
27 |
> emoji support (and reactions, thumbs-up counts, etc) integral to the |
28 |
> code review process. |
29 |
|
30 |
Excuse me but how are your visual feelings even remotely related to |
31 |
the topic at hand? If you want to troll GitHub, please find |
32 |
an appropriate forum to do so, and don't spam the mailing list. |
33 |
|
34 |
> Since you didn't address it, what tone was intended by the quip about |
35 |
> others "pretending" to not use GitHub? |
36 |
|
37 |
I'm not going to reply to your provocation. |
38 |
|
39 |
-- |
40 |
Best regards, |
41 |
Michał Górny |
42 |
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/> |