Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Summary Council meeting: Tuesday 11 December 2012
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 19:06:18
Message-Id: 50CB7877.5010905@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Summary Council meeting: Tuesday 11 December 2012 by Greg KH
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA256
3
4 On 14/12/12 01:28 PM, Greg KH wrote:
5 > On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 11:43:41AM +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote:
6 >> Handling separate /usr support ==============================
7 >> After the discussion on [1] during the previous meeting, a delay
8 >> of one month due to a new fork of udev was requested. We need an
9 >> update on what's happened.
10 >>
11 >> Chainsaw reported udev and eudev have moved on, and for both it
12 >> is now possible to have a separate /usr. The follow-up
13 >> discussion related to the /usr-merge is necessary.
14 >
15 > udev was never the problem of having a separate /usr without an
16 > initrd. Have all of the other packages been properly fixed to
17 > resolve this issue correctly?
18 >
19 > Also, what's the plan for eudev going forward?
20 >
21
22
23 Eudev's project announcement is coming soon, should answer your questions.
24
25 In terms of udev's dependencies, yes, the few dependencies that were
26 installing only to /usr (ie, kmod and xz-utils) have been switched to
27 install to /, and then fixed again due to issues with they way they
28 were done the first time so that they also work. I believe however
29 they are still ~arch keyworded.
30
31 There may of course be other entirely independent packages needed at
32 boot time prior to localmount, I do not know that status of those.
33 Once eudev (the gentoo package) fully supports separate-/usr (which it
34 doesn't at this time as it uses the same init scripts as udev-196), we
35 will be sure to resolve them.
36
37 It should be noted that sys-fs/udev (the package) since .. 186 I
38 think? whichever version dropped support for the failed-rules queue
39 (and whichever package dropped the udev-postmount init script) does
40 not support booting with a separate /usr. This has more to do with
41 how the package installs than the upstream code itself, though; as
42 such (WilliamH please correct me if I'm wrong) the plan is still to
43 require an initramfs if using sys-fs/udev with a separate-/usr.
44
45 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
46 Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
47
48 iF4EAREIAAYFAlDLeHcACgkQ2ugaI38ACPCErAEAug/ESN7UT1ll76ey9o2ZeNh4
49 khuFMK8Q5NsUiQBn9ukBAMA9ZeCQ5RqkaaKqEg9mMRDaaDUFepDWFisEhZBjNLy4
50 =iWNA
51 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies