Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: x86@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal: removing "server" profile variants from profiles.desc
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 10:01:33
Message-Id: CAG2jQ8hvDUcDv78Jpjpd1WpUpezcJzYaJQomRjgVAAR+rayxHA@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal: removing "server" profile variants from profiles.desc by Daniel Pielmeier
1 On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Daniel Pielmeier <billie@g.o> wrote:
2 > Markos Chandras schrieb am 12.10.2012 10:08:
3 >>
4 >> +1. I want these profiles to *staty*. I am using this profile on my
5 >> "home boxes". It is the most minimal profile as the rest of the
6 >> profiles pull in too much useless stuff. What is wrong with these
7 >> profiles anyway?
8 >>
9 >
10 > If you want a minimal profile you don't need the server profile.
11 >
12 > "ln -s ${PORTDIR}/profiles/default/linux/${ARCH}/10.0 make.profile"
13 > gives you a minimal profile.
14 >
15 > --
16 > Regards
17 > Daniel
18 >
19
20 I removed the ewarn message from the amd64/10.0/server profile. If
21 nobody objects I will remove it from the x86 as well (CC'ing x86 to
22 get their attention)
23
24 --
25 Regards,
26 Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2

Replies