| 1 |
I hope this discussion doesn't end when the warnings are removed. These |
| 2 |
server profiles are still useless and misleading, they do not need to exist |
| 3 |
in their current form. Your previous statement that these are the most |
| 4 |
minimal profiles, is not accurate. The base profiles are the most minimal |
| 5 |
(non-selinux) ones. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
-Ben |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 5:00 AM, Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o>wrote: |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Daniel Pielmeier <billie@g.o> |
| 12 |
> wrote: |
| 13 |
> > Markos Chandras schrieb am 12.10.2012 10:08: |
| 14 |
> >> |
| 15 |
> >> +1. I want these profiles to *staty*. I am using this profile on my |
| 16 |
> >> "home boxes". It is the most minimal profile as the rest of the |
| 17 |
> >> profiles pull in too much useless stuff. What is wrong with these |
| 18 |
> >> profiles anyway? |
| 19 |
> >> |
| 20 |
> > |
| 21 |
> > If you want a minimal profile you don't need the server profile. |
| 22 |
> > |
| 23 |
> > "ln -s ${PORTDIR}/profiles/default/linux/${ARCH}/10.0 make.profile" |
| 24 |
> > gives you a minimal profile. |
| 25 |
> > |
| 26 |
> > -- |
| 27 |
> > Regards |
| 28 |
> > Daniel |
| 29 |
> > |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> I removed the ewarn message from the amd64/10.0/server profile. If |
| 32 |
> nobody objects I will remove it from the x86 as well (CC'ing x86 to |
| 33 |
> get their attention) |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> -- |
| 36 |
> Regards, |
| 37 |
> Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2 |
| 38 |
> |
| 39 |
> |
Archives