Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] ACCEPT_RESTRICT for questionable values of RESTRICT
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 01:01:20
Message-Id: 200701101956.05373.vapier@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] ACCEPT_RESTRICT for questionable values of RESTRICT by Jakub Moc
1 On Wednesday 10 January 2007 19:22, Jakub Moc wrote:
2 > Mike Frysinger napsal(a):
3 > > On Wednesday 10 January 2007 18:36, Jakub Moc wrote:
4 > >> OK, dunno which of us is being dense; the whole point is that the damned
5 > >> ACCEPT_RESTRICT is completely redundant; hard to grok or what exactly?
6 > >> You already *don't* accept the restrict by sticking 'unattended' into
7 > >> FEATURES... WTH would you need to negate your FEATURES via another
8 > >> variable instead of simply altering the FEATURES (or not sticking such
9 > >> thing there in the first place?)
10 > >
11 > > did you even read his e-mail ? the GLEP isnt just about sandbox or
12 > > unattended ... i wont elaborate because i'll be copying & pasting his
13 > > e-mail
14 >
15 > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0052.html
16
17 sorry, s/glep/thread/
18
19 as stated in original e-mail, unattended/sandbox are just some examples, not
20 the only ones
21 -mike

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] ACCEPT_RESTRICT for questionable values of RESTRICT Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org>