Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] ACCEPT_RESTRICT for questionable values of RESTRICT | ||
| Date: | Thu, 11 Jan 2007 01:06:08 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20070111010154.0a28ffbd@snowdrop | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] ACCEPT_RESTRICT for questionable values of RESTRICT by Mike Frysinger |
||
| 1 | On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 19:56:00 -0500 Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> |
| 2 | wrote: |
| 3 | | as stated in original e-mail, unattended/sandbox are just some |
| 4 | | examples, not the only ones |
| 5 | |
| 6 | So which RESTRICT values *should* the user legitimately have to care |
| 7 | about? |
| 8 | |
| 9 | -- |
| 10 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| 11 | Mail : ciaranm at ciaranm.org |
| 12 | Web : http://ciaranm.org/ |
| 13 | Paludis, the secure package manager : http://paludis.pioto.org/ |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] ACCEPT_RESTRICT for questionable values of RESTRICT | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> |