| 1 |
On 9/29/13 7:41 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 |
> Even then, we won't get much more than compile testing, or whatever |
| 3 |
> test suites the packages happen to come with. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
That's right. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
I think we can rely on the time packages spend in ~arch to catch the |
| 8 |
issues that wouldn't come up with compile and test phases. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Also, when stable is not far behind testing, the testing that ~arch |
| 11 |
packages get is more applicable to stable (because there are less |
| 12 |
differences). This is one of the main reason for my push to stabilize |
| 13 |
more packages (always with proper testing), and I've also seen bugs |
| 14 |
being fixed in ~arch but the fixes are not always pushed to stable |
| 15 |
(which can be addressed by stabilizing more packages in general). |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Paweł |
Archives