| 1 |
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 19:24:41 +0200 |
| 2 |
Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> You seem to suggest there are issues, do you have any specific |
| 4 |
> concerns that we can address? |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
I've still not seen a full description of the problem you're trying to |
| 7 |
solve with prefix. The last time we tried this there were a lot of |
| 8 |
unanswered questions about your approach. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
What you have for prefix is fine for a "playing around" project, but |
| 11 |
unless you've moved on significantly from when we last discussed it, |
| 12 |
there's a significant gap between what you have and what you've been |
| 13 |
trying to do and what would be suitable or ideal for main tree use. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I think we'd all benefit from a proper discussion of goals and details |
| 16 |
of how various problems will be solved before moving prefix to an |
| 17 |
official EAPI. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives