| 1 |
> |
| 2 |
> It seems to me that consistency would demand the same thing for |
| 3 |
> *-update. I've been in a situation where I've needed to run |
| 4 |
> SOMETHING-update before, but couldn't remember what "SOMETHING" was. |
| 5 |
> Being able to tab complete update-<tab> would be great! |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 8 |
>> I just had an idea (how rare, eh?) and I wanted to see what other |
| 9 |
>> people thought of it. |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> What if we renamed all the *-config tools to config-* (gcc-config, |
| 12 |
>> distcc-config, java-config, etc. would move to config-gcc, |
| 13 |
>> config-distcc, config-java, etc.)? |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
>> This would allow people trying to configure anything to simply type |
| 16 |
>> config-<tab> and get a listing of what was available. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I had imagined renaming anything that was *-update to config-* also for |
| 19 |
consistency. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives