| 1 |
On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 23:18:09 -0500 (EST) |
| 2 |
"donnie berkholz" <spyderous@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> I had imagined renaming anything that was *-update to config-* also |
| 5 |
> for consistency. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Ehrm, IMHO *-update should be scripts that don't need any user |
| 8 |
interaction, like env-update or opengl-update (and yes, etc-update is an |
| 9 |
exception; even so it should really be called etc-config. ;) |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
so i partly disagree with renaming those to config-*, as it's not a |
| 12 |
configuration process, but an automatic update of something. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-- Markus |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Markus Nigbur |
| 18 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 19 |
http://www.gentoo.org |
Archives