| 1 |
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 00:09, Markus Nigbur wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 23:18:09 -0500 (EST) |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> "donnie berkholz" <spyderous@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > I had imagined renaming anything that was *-update to config-* also |
| 6 |
> > for consistency. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Ehrm, IMHO *-update should be scripts that don't need any user |
| 9 |
> interaction, like env-update or opengl-update (and yes, etc-update is an |
| 10 |
> exception; even so it should really be called etc-config. ;) |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Umm, in a sense opengl-update does need interaction - even if it's only |
| 13 |
passing command line parameters to the proggy. env-update is a different |
| 14 |
story; you just run it and it does it's thing. Personally, I would feel that |
| 15 |
opengl-update would be a good candidate to switch to config-. I can't think |
| 16 |
of too many that would fall into the update- class (using the |
| 17 |
"non-interactive" definition), but perhaps things like fixpackages? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Regards, |
| 20 |
Jason |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives