1 |
El dom, 07-10-2012 a las 08:55 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió: |
2 |
> El dom, 07-10-2012 a las 12:08 +0800, Ben de Groot escribió: |
3 |
> > On 7 October 2012 04:37, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
4 |
> > <chithanh@g.o> wrote: |
5 |
> > > Pacho Ramos schrieb: |
6 |
> > >> Hello |
7 |
> > >> |
8 |
> > >> I am noticing for a long time that bugs related with ekiga, opal, |
9 |
> > >> yate... are completely unattended by voip team for years. If nobody |
10 |
> > >> from that team is willing to maintain them, please move them to |
11 |
> > >> maintainer-needed to, at least, reflect reality. |
12 |
> > > |
13 |
> > > The members of the voip team are usually interested in a few specific |
14 |
> > > packages only. |
15 |
> > > |
16 |
> > > Many of the packages which have become unmaintained had a maintainer |
17 |
> > > once, but these were retired from Gentoo at some point. The package |
18 |
> > > was then left with the herd. Nobody in the herd was interested to |
19 |
> > > maintain them but nobody was sufficiently motivated to speak out |
20 |
> > > against this either. |
21 |
> > |
22 |
> > Does voip herd belong to any project, is there a leader? Can you guys |
23 |
> > get together and decide who is doing what? And then remove inactive |
24 |
> > devs from the herd, and put unmaintained packages up for grabs / |
25 |
> > assign to maintainer-needed? |
26 |
> > |
27 |
> > That would make things more transparent and maybe get some movement in |
28 |
> > open bugs. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> Yes, that would be the right thing to do as now there are a lot of |
31 |
> packages that are like in a "limbo" |
32 |
|
33 |
Any news here? I can move that packages to maintainer-needed if you send |
34 |
me the list of packages you don't want to maintain. Also, maybe |
35 |
telepathy stuff could be moved to its own herd (that is basically gnome |
36 |
team + tester... or maybe tester could join gnome team ;)) |