Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: djc@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-arch/bzip2: bzip2-1.0.5-r1.ebuild
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 09:43:56
Message-Id: 20110608114335.44a97df5@pomiocik.lan
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-arch/bzip2: bzip2-1.0.5-r1.ebuild by Dirkjan Ochtman
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:28:47 +0200
Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o> wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:27, Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> > wrote: > > In all cases I want one resource to look at, viewcvs is a horrible > > and slow interface. So it does make sense to keep changelogs filled > > with information - maybe automation is needed, I don't have a > > strong opinion either way. But don't make me do more work because > > you are lazy, that never ends well. > > IMO we should just make repoman commit update the ChangeLog.
What if we wanted to remove ChangeLogs then for autogeneration? Will we require all devs to quickly update their portage versions? -- Best regards, Michał Górny

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies