| 1 |
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 4:36 AM, Brian Dolbec <dolsen@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 22 Feb 2015 03:32:58 +0700 |
| 3 |
> C Bergström <cbergstrom@×××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> PathScale is interested to hire a full time dev (for at least a few |
| 6 |
>> months) in order to bring pkgcore back to life. |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> General goals |
| 9 |
>> 1) Make it capable of parsing/handling the current portage tree (We'll |
| 10 |
>> contribute all this work upstream/open source) |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> 2) Improve the web based front-end |
| 13 |
>> https://github.com/dol-sen/CoreBuilder/tree/master/corebuilder |
| 14 |
>> (some, but not all of this work may be open sourced) |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> I will give commit capability to whomever does do the work on |
| 19 |
> CoreBuilder, I will also create the porthole/backends portion of |
| 20 |
> porthole's SF repo there for as much of the backend changes that are |
| 21 |
> not Pathscale specific. I did have intention of splitting the backends |
| 22 |
> portion from porthole's main pkg anyway. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Thanks I really appreciate this. Would you ever consider moving this |
| 25 |
away from SF and to github instead? |
Archives