| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 05:21:06 +0000 |
| 4 |
> Steve Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 5 |
>> Whatever. EAPI="2" works fine with current software. Could you tell |
| 6 |
>> me why you're so hot on export'ing EAPI? I thought it was only |
| 7 |
>> relevant, environment-wise, to the ebuild and subshells. What is the |
| 8 |
>> use case for exporting it externally? |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> I'm going to ignore you until you post a lengthy explanation of why |
| 11 |
> what you just said was utter bollocks. You clearly don't have a clue |
| 12 |
> what you're talking about just now, and by continuing to post nonsense |
| 13 |
> like the above to the discussion you're wasting everyone's time. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Honestly, that was the single most wrong thing anyone's said in this |
| 16 |
> entire discussion. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
Er two questions, not statements. |
| 19 |
The package manager knows the value; so does bash. Why on earth does, say, |
| 20 |
make need to know it? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
(Not that it's hard to allow 'export' in the line, just wondering why it |
| 23 |
keeps getting raised as required.) |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives