Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@×××××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Eclasses (Was: Re: Re: [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI) [2])
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 12:17:56
Message-Id: 20071228121459.06cdbc85@blueyonder.co.uk
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: Eclasses (Was: Re: Re: [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI) [2]) by Steve Long
1 On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 05:21:06 +0000
2 Steve Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk> wrote:
3 > Whatever. EAPI="2" works fine with current software. Could you tell
4 > me why you're so hot on export'ing EAPI? I thought it was only
5 > relevant, environment-wise, to the ebuild and subshells. What is the
6 > use case for exporting it externally?
7
8 I'm going to ignore you until you post a lengthy explanation of why
9 what you just said was utter bollocks. You clearly don't have a clue
10 what you're talking about just now, and by continuing to post nonsense
11 like the above to the discussion you're wasting everyone's time.
12
13 Honestly, that was the single most wrong thing anyone's said in this
14 entire discussion.
15
16 --
17 Ciaran McCreesh

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Eclasses (Was: Re: Re: [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI) [2]) Steve Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk>