1 |
On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 23:37 +0100, Markus Ullmann wrote: |
2 |
> So to avoid thread hijacking, starting a new one. |
3 |
|
4 |
What exactly is this thread you are starting about? Just letting us know |
5 |
you did some random testing? |
6 |
|
7 |
> |
8 |
> I did some tests today and took sunrise overlay as testing ground. |
9 |
> It has roughly 2850 revisions. As a blog recommended, I fetched the raw |
10 |
> repo first to do the initial conversion to git. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Then all I did was a |
13 |
> git-svn init file:///home/jokey/sunrise-svn && git-svn fetch |
14 |
> It took 5 minutes and 12 secs for me on a not-so fast box. Then I had a |
15 |
> git repo that could do all the branching, file merging and stuff and it |
16 |
> sends it back to repo nicely. Even a reversion of a commit worked perfectly. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> git log gave this output: |
19 |
> commit a8c35b8efe130fca7e2c3bb0d589a2d251f381c3 |
20 |
> Author: ndansmith <ndansmith@12608f7e-a915-0410-b2f3-ce240db1b126> |
21 |
> Date: Thu Jan 25 03:35:02 2007 +0000 |
22 |
> |
23 |
> Removing old turl files in favor of surl |
24 |
> |
25 |
> git-svn-id: file:///home/jokey/test/svn@2856 |
26 |
> 12608f7e-a915-0410-b2f3-ce240db1b126 |
27 |
> |
28 |
> So judging from this, I'd say we could use advantages of both. Those who |
29 |
> wish git can go for it (the git repo, as pointed out on this list, can |
30 |
> initially be fetched via rsync or tarballs or whatever comes in handy) |
31 |
> and those who dislike git can just go with svn and be happy with it. |
32 |
> |
33 |
> Jokey |
34 |
> |
35 |
-- |
36 |
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
37 |
Gentoo Linux |
38 |
|
39 |
-- |
40 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |