| 1 |
On Friday 15 January 2010 20:24:38 Sebastian Pipping wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 01/16/10 00:33, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: |
| 3 |
> > - From the alternatives, /var/lib/layman doesn't sound right. If |
| 4 |
> > /var/cache/layman doesn't work, what about /var/spool/layman instead? |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Okay, how about |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> /var/spool/layman |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> then? Any objections? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
/var/spool/ is a terrible idea -- these are not jobs being queued waiting to |
| 13 |
be processed by a daemon and then removed. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
if you want to keep all of layman's stuff together, then about your only |
| 16 |
option is to create your own tree at like /var/layman/. the better idea |
| 17 |
though would be to split your stuff along the proper lines. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
cache files = /var/cache/layman/ |
| 20 |
config files = /etc/layman/ |
| 21 |
-mike |
Archives