1 |
On 12/31/10 12:13 PM, Petteri Räty wrote: |
2 |
> EAPI 0 might stick around for quite a while but for example deprecating |
3 |
> EAPI 1 shouldn't be as hard. |
4 |
|
5 |
That seems also to be a safe first step. EAPI-1 ebuilds were at least |
6 |
written with EAPIs in mind. That's obviously not true for EAPI-0. |
7 |
|
8 |
We could even deprecate EAPI-2 in favor of EAPI-3, hmmm.... |
9 |
|
10 |
I think a repoman non-fatal warning would be fine. If we have a warning |
11 |
about forcing -j1, we can surely have one about ancient EAPIs. |
12 |
|
13 |
Paweł Hajdan, Jr. |
14 |
|
15 |
P.S. I'm excited to see the progress with PMS and new EAPIs being more |
16 |
and more convenient and addressing frequent annoyances or deficiencies! |