Archives
Archives
| From: | Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] ACCEPT_RESTRICT for questionable values of RESTRICT | ||
| Date: | Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:38:25 | ||
| Message-Id: | 45A4F98C.6010105@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] ACCEPT_RESTRICT for questionable values of RESTRICT by Mike Frysinger |
||
| 1 | Mike Frysinger napsal(a): |
| 2 | > On Wednesday 10 January 2007 03:40, Jakub Moc wrote: |
| 3 | > if you're categorizing those as "commercial broken stuff" you might want to |
| 4 | > look up the word "commercial" |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Huh? I was referring to this link [1] on Bug 161045 (which presumably |
| 7 | started this whole debate) |
| 8 | |
| 9 | [1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=gentoo-user-de&m=115148403700916&w=2 |
| 10 | |
| 11 | The gcl borkage is your job [2] and you might want to finally revert |
| 12 | your broken commit: |
| 13 | |
| 14 | [2] |
| 15 | http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/dev-lisp/gcl/gcl-2.6.7-r2.ebuild?r1=1.2&r2=1.3 |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | -- |
| 19 | Best regards, |
| 20 | |
| 21 | Jakub Moc |
| 22 | mailto:jakub@g.o |
| 23 | GPG signature: |
| 24 | http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E |
| 25 | Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E |
| 26 | |
| 27 | ... still no signature ;) |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] ACCEPT_RESTRICT for questionable values of RESTRICT | Georgi Georgiev <chutz@×××.net> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] ACCEPT_RESTRICT for questionable values of RESTRICT | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> |