Archives
Archives
| From: | Georgi Georgiev <chutz@×××.net> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] ACCEPT_RESTRICT for questionable values of RESTRICT | ||
| Date: | Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:56:55 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20070110145353.GA11133@lion.gg3.net | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] ACCEPT_RESTRICT for questionable values of RESTRICT by Jakub Moc |
||
| 1 | maillog: 10/01/2007-15:34:52(+0100): Jakub Moc types |
| 2 | > Mike Frysinger napsal(a): |
| 3 | > > On Wednesday 10 January 2007 03:40, Jakub Moc wrote: |
| 4 | > > if you're categorizing those as "commercial broken stuff" you might want to |
| 5 | > > look up the word "commercial" |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > Huh? I was referring to this link [1] on Bug 161045 (which presumably |
| 8 | > started this whole debate) |
| 9 | > |
| 10 | > [1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=gentoo-user-de&m=115148403700916&w=2 |
| 11 | > |
| 12 | > The gcl borkage is your job [2] and you might want to finally revert |
| 13 | > your broken commit: |
| 14 | > |
| 15 | > [2] |
| 16 | > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/dev-lisp/gcl/gcl-2.6.7-r2.ebuild?r1=1.2&r2=1.3 |
| 17 | |
| 18 | I looked at the diff and it replaces export SANDBOX_ON=0 with |
| 19 | RESTRICT="sandbox". It seems that the problem is older than that |
| 20 | revision. |
| 21 | |
| 22 | -- |
| 23 | \ Georgi Georgiev \ Chuck Norris cannot love, he can only not \ |
| 24 | / chutz@×××.net / kill. / |
| 25 | \ http://www.gg3.net/ \ \ |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] ACCEPT_RESTRICT for questionable values of RESTRICT | Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o> |