From: | Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] ACCEPT_RESTRICT for questionable values of RESTRICT | ||
Date: | Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:04:56 | ||
Message-Id: | 45A529F8.9090509@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] ACCEPT_RESTRICT for questionable values of RESTRICT by Georgi Georgiev |
1 | Georgi Georgiev napsal(a): |
2 | >> The gcl borkage is your job [2] and you might want to finally revert |
3 | >> your broken commit: |
4 | >> |
5 | >> [2] |
6 | >> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/dev-lisp/gcl/gcl-2.6.7-r2.ebuild?r1=1.2&r2=1.3 |
7 | > |
8 | > I looked at the diff and it replaces export SANDBOX_ON=0 with |
9 | > RESTRICT="sandbox". It seems that the problem is older than that |
10 | > revision. |
11 | |
12 | No, the gcl problem didn't exist until vapier "fixed" the ebuild. I |
13 | still fail to see why RESTRICT=sandbox is any better than the |
14 | undocumented `export SANDBOX_ON=0` hack (which basically shouldn't be |
15 | used anywhere in the tree anyway, ideally)... |
16 | |
17 | |
18 | -- |
19 | Best regards, |
20 | |
21 | Jakub Moc |
22 | mailto:jakub@g.o |
23 | GPG signature: |
24 | http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E |
25 | Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E |
26 | |
27 | ... still no signature ;) |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] ACCEPT_RESTRICT for questionable values of RESTRICT | Georgi Georgiev <chutz@×××.net> |