1 |
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 12:49:33PM -0600, Ryan Hill wrote: |
2 |
> It might be worth noting that it appears that Gentoo would be the first |
3 |
> distribution to join. I'd be interested in knowing if the SFC considers |
4 |
> distributing closed-source or proprietary software (nero, ati/nvidia |
5 |
> drivers, vmware) to be "producing non-free software (as per the |
6 |
> Conservancy's charitable purpose)" as mentioned in section 2(b) of their |
7 |
> notes. Paragraph 2(a) seems to prohibit it. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> > a. The Project Will Be Free Software. The Conservancy and the Project agree that |
10 |
> > any software distributed by the Project will be distributed solely as Free Software. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> If that's not a problem I think this is a great idea. |
13 |
> |
14 |
|
15 |
It's not a problem - what we actually produce as a product, the ebuilds, etc., |
16 |
are free to distribute. |
17 |
|
18 |
-- |
19 |
|
20 |
-----o()o---------------------------------------------- |
21 |
Michael Cummings | #gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl |
22 |
Gentoo Perl Dev | on irc.freenode.net |
23 |
Gentoo/SPARC |
24 |
Gentoo/AMD64 |
25 |
GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E 9E7F 4E2E |
26 |
-----o()o---------------------------------------------- |
27 |
|
28 |
Hi, I'm a .signature virus! Please copy me in your ~/.signature. |