Archives
Archives
| From: | Agostino Sarubbo <ago@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> | ||
| Cc: | gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Re: stabilizing libraries without testing reverse deps | ||
| Date: | Mon, 30 Sep 2013 06:14:52 | ||
| Message-Id: | 106c82f3-8329-4237-adcd-bf84c1f05993@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] stabilizing libraries without testing reverse deps by Rich Freeman |
||
| 1 | This is a delicate point. |
| 2 | |
| 3 | If you look at the policy, it says to test few rdeps. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | The arch tester is in charge to test the packages on his architecture. These type of failures are _not_ architecture dependant. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | So, instead of have 10 ATs that are testing the same rdeps, seems logic that the maintainer could do it one time. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | What do you think? |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: stabilizing libraries without testing reverse deps | "Paweł Hajdan |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: stabilizing libraries without testing reverse deps | Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> |