Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Michael Palimaka <kensington@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo-hosted code review
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2015 12:26:48
Message-Id: n17kp6$1o3$1@ger.gmane.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-hosted code review by Michael Orlitzky
1 On 02/11/15 09:07, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
2 > On 11/01/2015 12:44 PM, Michael Palimaka wrote:
3 >> There's been a lot of discussion about relying on GitHub for pull
4 >> requests and code review and such, so I have set up a Phabricator
5 >> instance against gentoo.git to see how a free alternative might work.
6 >>
7 >> ...
8 >>
9 >> What do you think?
10 >>
11 >
12 > Thanks for working on this. I personally didn't like Phabricator very
13 > much when I used it, but I'm glad someone is trying out code review
14 > platforms. I could live with it.
15 >
16 > The big question for me is, does the apache user have write access to
17 > the gentoo.git repo? If it does, are we all comfortable with allowing a
18 > bajillion-line PHP application unchecked access to our repo? That's the
19 > serious problem I see with Gerrit, Gitlab and the rest.
20
21 It supports repository hosting, but that is optional. I too prefer the
22 idea of keeping the repo and other tools separate, so the demo is
23 running again plain anongit (and that seems to work fine).

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo-hosted code review Kristian Fiskerstrand <k_f@g.o>