Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Luke-Jr <luke-jr@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Cc: Jeremy Maitin-Shepard <jbms@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] unmaintained app-portage packages
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 14:51:30
Message-Id: 200311281451.27652.luke-jr@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] unmaintained app-portage packages by Jeremy Maitin-Shepard
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On Friday 28 November 2003 07:13 am, Jeremy Maitin-Shepard wrote:
5 > If you want a "toolkit-independent tool," you might as well just write
6 > another toolkit that abstracts the various toolkits. (Of course, then
7 > you might decide you need to make the tool independent of the toolkit
8 > abstracter, and so you write another toolkit to abstract the
9 > abstracter.) This all seems like a lot of work to make the buttons
10 > match...
11 Too bad nobody's made a toolkit abstraction toolkit yet. It'd be nice if GTK
12 and Qt had wrappers to use each other.
13 - --
14 Luke-Jr
15 Developer, Gentoo Linux
16 http://www.gentoo.org/
17 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
18 Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
19
20 iD8DBQE/x2DtZl/BHdU+lYMRAmXsAJ9/si/dZki5gadq8Q+YGhMpyJssSwCfX3I3
21 1z9sNF/eVXoEufTy+/5UHbA=
22 =AOjL
23 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
24
25 --
26 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] unmaintained app-portage packages Marius Mauch <genone@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] unmaintained app-portage packages Bob Miller <kbob@××××××××××.com>