1 |
On 00:39 Fri 05 Sep , Zac Medico wrote: |
2 |
> David Leverton wrote: |
3 |
> > 2008/9/5 Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>: |
4 |
> >> Both approaches are essentially equivalent but it's a little simpler |
5 |
> >> for ebuild writer if they don't have to customize the output file name. |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > But is it so much simpler as to justify adding a special |
8 |
> > gitweb-specific hack to the package managers? |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Well, it's not much different from the existing file extension logic |
11 |
> that's already built into the unpack function. I think what really |
12 |
> matters is whether or not the majority of people see it as a useful |
13 |
> extension. |
14 |
|
15 |
I'm not writing new ebuilds from scratch or changing SRC_URI of existing |
16 |
ebuilds so often (especially those with this particular requirement) |
17 |
that there's any meaningful barrier to using arros instead of having |
18 |
this custom thing. |
19 |
|
20 |
-- |
21 |
Thanks, |
22 |
Donnie |
23 |
|
24 |
Donnie Berkholz |
25 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux |
26 |
Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com |