Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: drobbins@××××××.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] EAPI 2 Draft
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2008 07:38:46
Message-Id: 48C0E224.3030808@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] EAPI 2 Draft by David Leverton
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 David Leverton wrote:
5 > 2008/9/5 Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>:
6 >> Both approaches are essentially equivalent but it's a little simpler
7 >> for ebuild writer if they don't have to customize the output file name.
8 >
9 > But is it so much simpler as to justify adding a special
10 > gitweb-specific hack to the package managers?
11
12 Well, it's not much different from the existing file extension logic
13 that's already built into the unpack function. I think what really
14 matters is whether or not the majority of people see it as a useful
15 extension.
16
17 - --
18 Thanks,
19 Zac
20 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
21 Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
22
23 iEYEARECAAYFAkjA4iMACgkQ/ejvha5XGaOPxwCfWolOw1zC+VbgrGrFQXqRwoXn
24 vDoAoOLGL+PXhyCb2+cmAI4INLfO9reS
25 =TXwO
26 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] EAPI 2 Draft "Fernando J. Pereda" <ferdy@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] EAPI 2 Draft Alec Warner <antarus@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] EAPI 2 Draft Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o>