| 1 |
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 08:00:09AM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 2:55 AM, Tony "Chainsaw" Vroon |
| 3 |
> <chainsaw@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> > On Wed, 2012-12-26 at 22:01 -0600, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 5 |
> >> Actually, since ulm pointed out in another thread that the |
| 6 |
> >> council has not mandated that we support separate /usr without an |
| 7 |
> >> initramfs, I am re-considering this. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > So now that the /usr-merge steamroller can not break systems through |
| 10 |
> > udev, because an alternative now exists... another way must be found? |
| 11 |
> > That seems rather immature. |
| 12 |
> > What must be forked next to keep this working? openrc? |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Tend to agree, assuming it causes no additional work for package maintainers. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
As I and others have said on this list a thousdand times, moving |
| 17 |
everything to /usr never had anything to do with systemd and udev. This |
| 18 |
is a completely separate topic. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
The arguments for moving everything into /usr seem to be pretty strong |
| 21 |
[1], and as gregkh and others have said, it would benefit us in the longrun |
| 22 |
to do it. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Given that, that is not even what I'm discussing. I am just discussing |
| 25 |
moving the libraries that we manually install into /lib* back to |
| 26 |
/usr/lib* on Linux. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
William |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
[1] http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/TheCaseForTheUsrMerge |
Archives