| 1 |
Diego Elio Pettenò posted on Tue, 30 Oct 2012 10:56:11 -0700 as excerpted: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On 30/10/2012 10:46, Duncan wrote: |
| 4 |
>> ... tho I had to remask gnutls-3.1.3 as I experienced some problem |
| 5 |
>> (IDR what) with it. But I'm running 3.1.2 without issue. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
>> What gnutls-3.1.x are you planning to unmask? Do I need to try 3.1.3 |
| 8 |
>> again and file a bug (if there's not one filed already) if the problem |
| 9 |
>> still exists, or is 3.1.2 good enough? |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Given that 3.1.2 is not in tree anymore there's no choice uh? Beside, I |
| 12 |
> don't go masking micro versions around. If you think there's a problem |
| 13 |
> with 3.1.3, please test and let us know as I haven't hit any (that's |
| 14 |
> what I've been using myself, and testing the tinderbox against). |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Followup, FWIW... |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I forgot I had copied the gnutls 3.1.2 ebuild from /var/db/pkg to keep |
| 19 |
portage from trying to unmerge it, when 3.1.3 wouldn't build. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
But it seems the problem I had must have been the parallel-build issue |
| 22 |
fixed on Oct. 19, according to the changelog. The date on my 3.1.2 binpkg |
| 23 |
rebuild is Oct. 17, while 3.1.2 was removed with the 3.1.3 introduction |
| 24 |
on the 13th. So I obviously tried to build it and failed, then with it |
| 25 |
masked again, found the old version unavailable in-tree, so copied it to |
| 26 |
my overlay from portage's pkg database, in ordered to keep portage from |
| 27 |
trying to downgrade to 2.x. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
But it built and installed just fine when I tried it just now. Thanks to |
| 30 |
you and Dane S. both! =:^) |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 34 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 35 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
Archives